Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Sunday
May 08
10:30 - 11:30
Poster Station 2
12: GI
Pierfrancesco Franco, Italy
Poster Discussion
Clinical
Patterns of failure in anal cancer after IMRT and chemotherapy: Impact of 1 vs 2 doses of Mitomycin.
Zainab Al Habsi, Canada
PD-0501

Abstract

Patterns of failure in anal cancer after IMRT and chemotherapy: Impact of 1 vs 2 doses of Mitomycin.
Authors:

Zainab Al Habsi1, Kurian Joseph2, Aswin Abraham3, Mustafa Al Balushi3, Gabriella Tankel4, Karen Mulder5, Heather Warkentin6, Dan Schiller7, Keith Tankel8, Nawaid Usmani8, Diane Severin3, Kim Paulson3, Hatim Karachiwala9, Clarence Wong10, Tirath Nijjar3, Corinne Doll11

1Cross Cancer Institute , Radiation Oncology, Edmonton, Canada; 2Cross Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Edmonton , Canada; 3Cross Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Edmonton, Canada; 4University of Alberta, Research, Edmonton, Canada; 5Cross Cancer Institute, Medical Oncology, Edmonton, Canada; 6Cross Cancer Institute, Medical Physics, Edmonton, Canada; 7Royal Alexandra Hospital, General Surgery, Edmonton, Canada; 8Cross Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology , Edmonton, Canada; 9Cross Cancer Institute, Medical Oncology , Edmonton, Canada; 10Royal Alexandra Hospital, Gastroenterology, Edmonton, Canada; 11TOM BAKER CANCER CENTRE, Radiation Oncology, Calgary, Canada

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) with 2 doses of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C (MMC) is the standard of care for anal canal cancer (ACC) in North America, while 1 dose of MMC has been standard in Europe. Given the lack of randomized data of 1 vs. 2 doses of MMC on disease outcomes, we have conducted a population-based study to elucidate the impact of 1 vs. 2 doses of MMC on patterns of treatment failure (POF) and outcomes in ACC treatment.

Material and Methods

Data was collected from the provincial cancer registry of patients with stage I-III ACC who were treated with concurrent CRT from 2000 to 2018. Primary outcome measures were patterns of failure, recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

428 patients with a median age of 58 years (29-88 years) were included in this analysis. 234 (54.7%) patients received 1 dose of MMC and 194 (45.3%) received 2 doses of MMC. At a median follow-up of 78.5 months (5-252 months), 89 (20.8%) patients developed disease recurrence: 44 (10.3%) loco-regionally, 39 (9.1%) distally and 6 (1.4%) had both local and distant recurrences. Cox regression analysis showed that the dosage of MMC did not have an impact on overall recurrence (HR=0.883, p=0.561), with the exception of patients with stage III disease who had a significantly higher risk of recurrence (HR=5.238, p=0.021). Subgroup analysis showed an association between stage IIIB and IIIC with recurrence (HR=13.33, p=0.008 and HR=6.933, p=0.011 respectively), but was not impacted by the use of 1 vs. 2 doses of MMC. The dosage of MMC was not associated with incidence of local recurrence (HR=1.136, p=0.655) or distant recurrence (HR=0.743, p=0.267). However, in Stage IIIC patients, 2 doses of MMC showed a trend towards improved distant RFS (HR=0.626, p=0.084). The median RFS and OS were not reached for either groups. The mean RFS was 192.2 and 200.6 months for 2 MMC and 1 MMC respectively (p=0.864). The mean OS was 171.8 and 182.4 months for 2 MMC and 1 MMC respectively (p=0.758).

Conclusion

Our analysis showed that the patterns of failure and the risk of loco-regional and distant failures were similar between ACC patients who received 1 vs. 2 doses of MMC for stage groups I to IIIC disease. These finding support routine use of single dose of MMC with 5FU and radiotherapy for definitive CRT. However, a trend towards better RFS was demonstrated with a second dose of MMC in patients with stage IIIC disease.