Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

RTT treatment planning, OAR and target definitions
Poster (digital)
RTT
Determining treatment margins in hypo-fractionated (Fast Forward) breast treatment.
Frank Van den Heuvel, The Netherlands
PO-1880

Abstract

Determining treatment margins in hypo-fractionated (Fast Forward) breast treatment.
Authors:

Linda van der Heijden1, Patricia Brouwers2, Bleddyn Jones3, Barbara Wachters2, Frank Van den Heuvel4,3

1Zuidwest Radiotherapeutisch Instituut,, DPK, Vlissingen, The Netherlands; 2Zuidwest Radiotherapeutisch Instituut,, Clinic, Vlissingen, The Netherlands; 3University of Oxford, Oncology, Oxford, United Kingdom; 4Zuidwest Radiotherapeutisch Instituut, Physics, Vlissingen, The Netherlands

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

A reduced number of fractions for breast cancer treatment is indicated . Using five  fractions has been shown to be safe. The techniques used, were direct translations of the standard, the only change was the number and size of the various fractions.

However, margins used with a high number of fractions were used, but the statistical power of the various clinical trials was likely to be insufficient to detect any inadequacies.

1. Margin calculations rely on the concepts of normal distributions, an invalid assumption.

2. Margins impact healthy tissue, which can vary depending on the radio-biological properties of specific normal tissues

Here we analyse the efficacy of the current margins used in whole breast treatments.

Material and Methods

20 patients (10 left, 10 right) treated to the whole breast were entered in an audit study. Plans were generated for treatments 2.67Gy x 15 frx and 5.2Gy x 5 fx, using the recommended constraints for normal tissue.

For each patient 20 systematic errors are generated, and doses recalculated. Shifts shifts from this position is determined by the number of fractions. For each treatment instance the Effective Uniform Dose (EUD) for all structures is calculated. Here we report on Heart, Lung ( α/β = 3.0 late toxicity) and Liver ( α/β = 1.0).

Results

Figure 1 shows the variations of EUD (Gy) in a boxplot as a function of the systematic and random errors (Σ and σ) . 

In the fast forward arm more outliers are noted indicating “unlucky” patients. However the outliers only occur with Σ and σ larger than 5mm.

Conclusion

Margins used in the treatment of breast cancer are adequate if errors are smaller than 5mm. Daily treatment imaging becomes a necessity in order to achieve this degree of accuracy.