Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Brachytherapy: Urology (prostate, bladder, penile)
Poster (digital)
Brachytherapy
Developing a High-Volume, High-Efficiency CT-Based High Dose Rate Prostate Brachytherapy Workflow
Brandon Barney, USA
PO-1813

Abstract

Developing a High-Volume, High-Efficiency CT-Based High Dose Rate Prostate Brachytherapy Workflow
Authors:

Brandon Barney1, Remy Manigold2, Ian Gordon1, Melanie Cornia1, Ryan Hecox1

1Intermountain Healthcare, Radiation Oncology, Salt Lake City, USA; 2Scripps Health, Radiation Oncology, San Diego, USA

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

To illustrate a robust CT-based single daily fraction, high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) workflow modified over several years to utilize available resources, with a goal of optimizing clinical efficiency and reducing patient procedural time while maintaining quality treatment plans.

Material and Methods

An approach of (1) parallel-processing, (2) mitigation of possible errors/uncertainty, and (3) development of tools and ideal setups were utilized to streamline the implantation, treatment planning and treatment delivery processes.

Parallel-processing consisted of simultaneous target and avoidance structure definition at a Velocity workstation, BT catheter digitization at an Eclipse workstation, and catheter-transfer tube-afterloader connections, with each process conducted by a capable member of the care team.

Concern regarding needle migration was reduced by employing a Diacor Zephyr patient transfer system to safely and quickly transport the patient to the CT table and to the BT vault without displacing BT catheters.

Standardized templates for dose prescription, target/normal structure naming, planning optimization, and plan objectives were utilized to accelerate and homogenize the treatment planning process, enabling reproducible plan quality. Physics second checks were facilitated through the creation and implementation of a custom Excel sheet. A free-hand, non-fixed, non-stepper-stabilizer approach was employed by the implanting radiation oncologist/urologist team, allowing for more freedom during the implant and quicker setup/tear down times in the operating room (OR).

Results

Data for 293 implants treated from 2014-2018 was analyzed. Some implants did not have all data points available, but implants with at least 1 data point were included in the analysis. Times were as follows: 38±8 minutes for implant time, 96±18 minutes from OR start time until planning CT scan completion, 55±15 minutes for treatment planning, 13.5±7 minutes for final treatment preparation, and 187±26 minutes for total procedure time (OR start time until BT catheter removal).

Conclusion

By employing parallel-processing, error mitigation, and novel tools and setups in a targeted approach, it is possible to have an efficient CT-based prostate HDR workflow that can rival the efficiency of ultrasound-based prostate HDR BT or even low-dose rate (LDR) BT. This has obvious implications for patient comfort/quality of life and radiation oncology departmental efficiency.