Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Imaging acquisition and processing
Poster (digital)
Physics
Automated stability study on mpMRI prostate radiomics features to variations in segmentation
Sithin Thulasi Seetha, Italy
PO-1595

Abstract

Automated stability study on mpMRI prostate radiomics features to variations in segmentation
Authors:

Sithin Thulasi Seetha1,2, Enrico Garanzini3, Antonella Messina3, Chiara Tenconi4, Cristina Marenghi2, Barbara Avuzzi5, Mario Catanzaro6, Silvia Stagni6, Sergio Villa5, Barbara Noris Chiorda5, Fabio Badenchini2, Janarthan Panchakumar7, Elena Bertocchi2, Emanuele Pignoli4, Riccardo Valdagni2,5,8, Alessandra Casale3, Nicola Nicolai6, Tiziana Rancati2

1GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Precision Medicine, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands; 2Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Prostate Cancer Program, Milan, Italy; 3Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Unit of Radiology, Milan, Italy; 4Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Unit of Medical Physics, Milan, Italy; 5Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Unit of Urology, Milan, Italy; 6Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Unit of Radiation Oncology 1, Milan, Italy; 7Politecnico di Milano, Dept. of Bioengineering, Milan, Italy; 8Università degli Studi di Milano, Dept. of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Milan, Italy

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

To propose a novel method to evaluate the stability of radiomic features (RFs) extracted from multiparametric (mp)MRI sequences to variations in segmentation using in-silico contour generation. We applied the process to the whole prostate region. The stable RFs identified are then used to extract a robust subset of radiomic features. 

Material and Methods

To evaluate the stability of RFs to variations in segmentation, we simulated various under- and/or over-segmentation scenarios commonly seen in clinical practice using the principle of data augmentation in deep learning. The overall workflow is illustrated in Figure 1.a. The manual delineation by a single radiologist was perturbed using geometric transformations such as rotation, scaling, and shifting to generate the synthetic segmentations. We considered 3 categories of augmentations (in-plane, out-plane, and in&out-plane) and 2 types of biases (random and systematic) as part of the study (see Fig. 2 for definitions). T2w, ADC, and DCE-SUB sequences with delineated whole prostate were considered as part of the investigation. We extracted 1595 RFs (using Pyradiomics) from each image sequence-segmentation pair. We used a wide range of filters such as LoG, wavelet, squared, square root, logarithm, and exponential filters to see the impact of various filtering strategies on the stability of RFs. 

Fig. 1.b summarizes the datasets used in this study. We used the internal population to identify the stable RFs, while we used the external set to select the robust subset of RFs (by considering the overlap). We chose the intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC(1,1), to assess the stability of RFs, and we considered a feature as stable if the lower bound associated with the 95% CI of the ICC estimate had a value ≥ 0.90. 


Results

Here, the results are simplified to present only the best filter (or non-filter) that led to the maximum number of stable and robust RFs (different filters for different RFs families). Table 2 summarizes the percentage of best-filtered stable & robust RFs derived from T2w, ADC, and DCE-SUB maps.  



Augmentation Scenario

% of stable features (% of robust features)

T2w

ADC

SUBwash-in

SUBwash-out

in-plane-random

99.06 (81.31)

98.13 (98.13)

97.20 (95.33)

98.13 (96.26)

in-plane-systematic

98.13 (48.60)

98.13 (90.65)

97.20 (94.39)

98.13 (97.20)

out-plane

100 (97.20)

100 (86.91)

100 (98.13)

100 (98.13)

in&out-plane-random

98.13 (79.44)

98.13 (82.24)

97.20 (92.52)

98.13 (95.33)

in&out-plane-systematic

98.13 (50.47)

97.20 (73.83)

96.26 (90.65)

97.20 (90.65)

Conclusion

Variations in segmentation impact the stability of RFs. We propose a novel method that can be easily integrated into any pipeline, which can be used to identify RFs stable to such variability. Since this is a fully automated method, it avoids the need for multiple radiologists to annotate the dataset. The robust subset of features identified can be considered for further modeling or analysis.