Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Dosimetry
Poster (digital)
Physics
What are the oesophagus dosimetric constraints during breast cancer hypofractionated radiotherapy?
Fatma Dhouib, Tunisia
PO-1563

Abstract

What are the oesophagus dosimetric constraints during breast cancer hypofractionated radiotherapy?
Authors:

Fatma Dhouib1, Maiem Frikha2, Nejla Fourati3, Zied Fessi3, Leila Farhat3, Wafa Mnejja3, Jamel Daoud3

1Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, oncology-radiotherapy, Sfax, Tunisia; 2Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, oncology-Radiotherapy, Sfax, Tunisia; 3Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, Oncology-radiotherapy, Sfax, Tunisia

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Hypofractionated radiotherapy (HRT) is becoming a valid option in the treatment of breast cancer. However, data are missing concerning the normal tissues dosimetric constraints. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cumulative doses in the oesophagus during HRT for breast cancer with a clinical toxicities correlation in order to propose dosimetric constraints adapted to this type of fractionation.

Material and Methods

This is a retrospective study analyzing the dosimetric plans of 41 patients treated with adjuvant locoregional (LR) radiotherapy for localized breast cancer between January and December 2020. The treatment plan was carried out according to a three dimensional (3D) conformational technique. The total dose prescribed was 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions with a boost of 10 Gy in 4 fractions in the tumor bed in case of a conservative treatment (35%) and 40 Gy in 15 fractions in case of a radical treatment (65%) at a rate of 5 fractions per week. The whole esophagus was delineated. By analyzing the dose-volume histogram, we retrospectively recorded the mean dose (Dmean), the maximum dose (Dmax), the volume receiving more than: 17 Gy (V17) , 30 Gy (V30)  and 35 Gy (V35). These dosimetric constraint levels were defined by calculating the biological equivalent dose. Clinical assessment of esophageal toxicity was performed at the end of the radiotherapy sessions and 6 months later, using a questionnaire based on the RTOG clinical scales. Data analysis was performed by SPSS version 20.

Results

The median of Dmean, Dmax, V17, V30, and V35 were respectively of 4.14Gy [0.8-12.85], 37Gy [2.5-43], 8% [0-33.87], 2.2% [0-25.7] and 0.02% [0-18.26]. The 3rd quartile (Q3) of Dmean, Dmax, V17, V30 and V35 were respectively of 7.3 Gy, 39 Gy, 18.3%, 9% and 2.7%.

The following table summarizes the data of the cumulative doses in the oesophagus:


At the end of radiotherapy sessions, seven patients (17.07%) have reported a radiation-induced esophagitis (garde 1 in 6 cases and grade 2 in only one case). Of these seven patients, the Dmax in the oesophagus was > 35 Gy in 6 cases and > 38 Gy in 5 cases. At six months after the end of the radiotherapy, no patient had clinical signs of esophagitis.

Conclusion

Radiation-induced esophagitis is one of the most underestimated complications in locoregional treatment of localized breast cancers. In the absence of radiation-induced esophagitis prevention guidelines, we propose a systematic delineation of the whole esophagus in case of LR HRT in order to minimize as much as possible the cumulative doses at its level. The results of this study show that these constraints could be reasonable to respect during dosimetric optimization: Dmean <= 8 Gy, Dmax <= 38 Gy, V17 <= 19% and V30 <= 9%. However, these results should to be confirmed by larger series.