Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Mixed sites/palliation
Poster (digital)
Clinical
CT-GUIDED FIDUCIAL PLACEMENT FOR ROBOTIC STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY: EFFICACY AND SAFETY
Mauro Loi, Italy
PO-1469

Abstract

CT-GUIDED FIDUCIAL PLACEMENT FOR ROBOTIC STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY: EFFICACY AND SAFETY
Authors:

Mauro Loi1, Ivano Bonucci2, Laura Masi2, Raffaella Doro3, Giulio Francolini1, Vanessa Di Cataldo3, Pierluigi Bonomo1, Luca Visani3, Marco Tempobono3, Niccolo Bellosi3, Silvia Pazzaglini3, Marco Cassinelli3, Gabriele Simontacchi1, Daniela Greto1, Isacco Desideri4, Sara Lucidi4, Michele Aquilano4, Lorenzo Livi4

1Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Radiation Oncology, Florence, Italy; 2Istituto Fiorentino di Cura e Assistenza (IFCA) , Radiation Oncology, Florence, Italy; 3Istituto Fiorentino di Cura e Assistenza (IFCA), Radiation Oncology, Florence, Italy; 4University of Florence, Radiation Oncology, Florence, Italy

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) employs radiopaque fiducial markers implanted near the tumor for real-time tracking. Fiducials are usually placed before simulation in a dedicated interventional radiology platform. This represents a limitation to treatment availability and may result in potential treatment delay. In our Institution, an in-house percutaneous CT-guided fiducial placement procedure was implemented for pelvic SBRT. The aim of our study is to evaluate the performance and side effects of in-house fiducial placement.

Material and Methods

Patients underwent percutaneous fiducial insertion with a 18 G needle under CT guidance, using a radiopaque skin marker to calculate the depth of target location from body surface (Figure 1). Careful skin asepsis and local anaesthesia was obtained at the insertion site. A >2 cm spacing between fiducials was advised. One week after placement, simulation CT and orthogonal X-ray imaging were acquired to verify fiducial usability for SBRT tracking. Data from a consecutive cohort of patients treated with fiducial-guided, robotic-arm pelvic SBRT were collected from January 2018 to September 2021. Success rate was defined as the implanted/tracked fiducials ratio. Kruskal Wallis-test was used to compare median success rate over time.


Results

In the observed time frame, 282 patients underwent CT-guided fiducial placement, accounting for 883 implanted fiducials (median 3, range 1-4). Target sites were the prostate bed, extra-spinal bones and pelvic lymph nodes in 158 (56%), 37 (13%) and 87 (31%) patients, respectively. Side effects consisted of minor bleeding at the insertion site and transient pain requiring medication after 24 hours in 5 patients (2%). No grade >2 toxicity was observed, particularly infectious or haemorrhagic complications.

Overall success rate was 86% (719/833); median success rate per procedure was 100% (range 50-100%). Among the 114 fiducials rejected for tracking, failure was due to migration in 63 cases (55%) and misplacement in 51 cases (45%). In the subset of patients receiving 3 fiducials (n=161), at least 3 fiducials were used for tracking in 80% (n=129) of patients.  Overall success rate increased across the observed time window from 2018 (53/73, 74%) to 2019 (245/293, 84%) to 2020 (246/272, 90%) to 2021 (175/195, 90%) (Figure 2). A consistent, statistically significant improvement in median success rate was observed over time from 2018 (75%, Interquartile Range, IQR 67-100%) to 2019 (100%, IQR 75-100%)   to 2020 (100%, IQR 75-100%)   to 2021 (100%, IQR 100-100%) : p= 0.0008.


Conclusion

Our in-house percutaneous CT-guided fiducial placement is a safe procedure requiring minimal standard equipment, resulting in success rates comparable with published experiences performed in a dedicated interventional radiology setting. A consistent improvement in median success rate was observed over 4 years, suggesting the need for appropriate interventions to shorten the learning curve.