Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Urology
Poster (digital)
Clinical
PSMA-PET management of prostate cancer patients relapsing after RP plus prostate-bed radiotherapy
Valeria Chiofalo, Italy
PO-1396

Abstract

PSMA-PET management of prostate cancer patients relapsing after RP plus prostate-bed radiotherapy
Authors:

Valeria Chiofalo1, Giuseppe Carlo Iorio1, Ilaria Bonavero1, Sara Bartoncini1, Veronica Richetto2, Serena Grimaldi3, Sara Dall'Armellina3, Désirée Deandreis4, Beatrice Lillaz5, Marco Oderda5, Paolo Gontero5, Alessia Guarneri1, Umberto Ricardi1

1University of Turin, Department of Oncology, Turin, Italy; 2University of Turin, Department of Medical Physics, Turin, Italy; 3University of Turin, Department of Medical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine, Turin, Italy; 4University of Turin, Deparment of Medical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine, Turin, Italy; 5University of Turin, Department of Surgical Sciences, Urology, Turin, Italy

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

to evaluate the impact of PSMA-PET in the management of prostate cancer patients (pts) relapsing after radical prostatectomy (RP) plus prostate-bed (PB) RT: failure-sites identification and treatment-guidance.

Material and Methods

we retrospectively analyzed data of patients experiencing biochemical recurrence (BCR) post-RP and PB-RT (adjuvant and salvage settings) and restaged with PSMA-PET. To be included in the present analysis, no PSMA-PET had to be performed prior to salvage PB-RT. The aim was to identify failure-sites and to assess the biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) rate following any positive PSMA-PET oriented treatment. Among patients treated exclusively with SBRT, ADT-free survival was also evaluated.

Results

85 patients with BCR following RP (pN0-pNx) plus PB-RT and staged with PSMA-PET between June 2016 and October 2020 were included in the present analysis. PB-RT was performed as adjuvant RT (ART) in 27 pts: 26 (96,3%) had a p-staging ³ pT3 (15 pT3a, 11 pT3b) and 24 (88,8%) had R+. The remaining 58 pts had received salvage RT (SRT), with a median pre-treatment PSA of 0,47 ng/ml (range 0,10 – 3,3). Overall, 14 pts had received ADT along with PB-RT. The median interval from the end of PB-RT to subsequent BCR was 35,1 months (range 1 – 153).
The median PSA at PSMA-PET was 0,56 ng/ml (range 0,24 – 9,68). PSMA-PET was positive in 44 patients (75,86%): 27/58 SRT (46,5%) and 17/27 ART (62,9%). Fifty-four lesions were detected. 
The most common site (48,2%) was regional nodal: 26 lesions in 20 pts [Tab.1]. Positive PSMA-PET oriented treatment was: ADT (Arm-1) for 15 pts (34%), SBRT/Salvage-Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection (S-PLND) (Arm-2) for 11 pts (25%), and SBRT/S-PLND + ADT (Arm-3) for 16 pts (36,4%) [Tab.1]. 
Details about treatment per failure-site are reported in Tab.1.
No treatment data were available for 2 pts after positive PSMA-PET. The median bPFS following any treatment guided by positive PSMA-PET was 10,9 months (range 2 – 50,8) [Fig.1]. Overall, 32 pts (72,7%) received ADT: 13 short term (40,6%); and 17 (53,1%) long term, of whom 15 still undergoing ADT. Among those treated exclusively with SBRT (9/44, 20,5%), 7 recurred (77,8%) with a median bPFS of 7,8 months (range 4,4 – 18,12). For the 2 pts not relapsed after exclusive SBRT, the median ADT-free survival was 27,3 months (12,6 – 42). Overall, just 1 death was recorded (other cause). The median observation time from PSMA-PET to the last follow-up following PSMA-oriented treatment was 38,6 months (range 4,5 – 55,6).
A statistically significant difference (p = 0.01) in terms of bPFS was recorded between Arm-1, Arm-2 and Arm-3: at 30 months bPFS was 40,4% for Arm-1, 13,6% for Arm-2 and 65,8% for Arm-3 [Fig.1]

Conclusion

PSMA-PET can represent an optimal imaging modality to identify failure-sites at early stages of biochemical relapse in prostate cancer patients initially treated with RP plus PB-RT(± ADT).