Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Upper GI
Poster (digital)
Clinical
Acute toxicity and clinical outcome in carcinoma middle oesophagus treated with definitive CTRT
Shreya Jalota, India
PO-1291

Abstract

Acute toxicity and clinical outcome in carcinoma middle oesophagus treated with definitive CTRT
Authors:

Shreya Jalota1, Rohini Khurana2, Ajeet K Gandhi1, Madhup Rastogi3, Rahat Hadi4, S P Mishra4, Anoop Kumar Srivastava3, Avinav Bharati3

1Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia institute of medical sciences, Radiation Oncology, Lucknow, India; 2Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia institute of medical sciences, Radiation oncology, Lucknow , India; 3Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia institute of medical sciences , Radiation Oncology , Lucknow, India; 4Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia institute of medical sciences , Radiation Oncology , Lucknow , India

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Although neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) followed by surgery is preferred, definitive CTRT is also one of the recommended management strategies for squamous cell carcinoma of middle oesophagus (ME-SCC). Definitive CTRT protocols are evolving. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the acute toxicity and early clinical outcome in ME-SCC treated with definitive CTRT using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB).

Material and Methods

We enrolled 15 patients of histologically proven ME-SCC in a prospective interventional study (IEC 54/19) between December 2019 to December 2020. 60 Gray at 2 Gray per fraction was delivered to the gross disease and elective nodes were irradiated to 48 Gray at 1.6 Gray per fraction, 5 fractions per week with SIB-VMAT. Concurrent cisplatin 75mg/m2 (on day 1 and day 21) and 5-Fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 (day 1 to 4 and day 21 to 25) were delivered. Acute toxicities are reported with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

Results

Median age was 52 years (32- 68 years) and 60% were female. Median Karnofsky performance scale was 80. Stage distribution was II:III in  9:6 patients respectively. 13 patients (86.6%) completed CTRT as per protocol. Due to treatment related toxicity, one patient received 50Gy with 2 cycles of concurrent chemotherapy and one patient succumbed after 5 fractions of radiotherapy due to unknown reason.

Median V95 for planning target volume (PTV) for primary and elective nodes was 98.42±1.48% and 99.43±0.82% respectively. Median mean dose received by both lungs was 18.64±2.81 and median lung volume receiving 20Gy (V20) was 33.16±5.23% of the total lung volume. Median Dmax of cord and median mean dose to heart were 42.5±1.15Gy and 27.17±6.05Gy respectively. 

Median follow-up was 13 months (5-19 months). 10 (67%) patients had complete response till the time of last follow-up, 1 patient had recurrence of disease after six months of completion of treatment, 3 patients had residual disease at the time of first follow-up. Acute toxicity profiles observed were grade 3 in 3 patients (20%), grade 4 (dysphagia) in 1 patient (6.6%). None had grade 5 toxicity. The highest grade of various Grade 1-3 toxicities assessed are enumerated in Table 1. At the end of 3 months only 1 patient with no radiological evidence of disease, had grade 3 dysphagia.


ToxicityGrade 1Grade 2Grade 3
Haematological4 (26.6%)2 (13.3%)1 (6.6%)
Dysphagia5 (33.3%)7 (46.6%)2 (13.3%)
Esophagitis10 (66.6%)5 (33.3%)0
Pneumonitis5 (33.3%)4 (26.6%)0
Dermatitis Radiation4 (26.6%)00


Conclusion

In patients of ME-SCC treated with definitive CTRT, SIB-VMAT yields a favourable dosimetry with sparing of organs at risk. The treatment regimen is well tolerated with acceptable acute toxicity profile and excellent early clinical outcome with complete response in 2/3rd of patients.