Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Breast
Poster (digital)
Clinical
FAST protocol in breast radiotherapy: anthropometric parameters, dosimetric results and toxicity.
Rita Marina Niespolo, Italy
PO-1212

Abstract

FAST protocol in breast radiotherapy: anthropometric parameters, dosimetric results and toxicity.
Authors:

Rita Marina Niespolo1, Sara Terrevazzi2, Sara Trivellato3, Chiara Chissotti2, Maria Chiara Innati4, Paolo Caricato5, Valeria Faccenda6, Gianluca Montanari5, Denis Panizza5, Valerio Pisoni1, Stefano Arcangeli1

1 H.S. Gerardo, Radiation Oncology, Monza, Italy; 2H.S. Gerardo, Radiation Oncology, Monza, Italy; 3H.S. Gerardo, Physics Department, Monza, Italy; 4 H.S. Gerardo , Radiation Oncology, Monza, Italy; 5 H.S. Gerardo, Physics Department, Monza, Italy; 6 H.S. Gerardo, Physics Department, Monza, Italy

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Hypofractionated radiotherapy is not widespread, although recent studies have proven its non-inferiority after primary surgery for early-stage breast cancer (BC). This study analysed the preliminary data and factors influencing acute skin toxicity in BC patients, treated according to the radiotherapy FAST protocol.

Material and Methods

Early-BC patients were treated with 28.5 Gy in 5 fractions once a week (FAST protocol) using the 3D-CRT field-in-field (FIF) technique at a single Institution. Clinical target volumes (CTVs), dosimetric parameters, and tumour characteristics were recorded and analysed. The parameters measured to assess the breast size are the cup size, the nipple-to-pectoral muscle distance (NPD), and the maximum medio-lateral thickness (MLT), along tangential fields. Adverse skin reactions were assessed according to CTCAE v. 5.0 at the end of treatment and after one month.

Results

Between December 2020 and October 2021, 34 early-BC patients (median age 66 years, 51–84) were enrolled, of whom 6 underwent forced deep-inspiration breath-hold. 57% of patients had fair skin (skin phototype I/II according to the Fitzpatrick scale). The median CTV volume was 393 cm3 (60.3-855.7) with a median NPD of 4.7 cm (1.7-8) and a median MLT of 21.9 cm (14.3-32.3). The 5,8%, 34,2%, 40%, and 20% of patients wore an A, B, C, and D bra cup-size, respectively. CTVs registered a median V95% of 99.6% (96.6-100.0) and a median V105% of 0.1% (0.0-4.7). The median 105% isodose was 2.33 cm3 (0.0-48.0) of whom 0.6 cm3 (0.0-5.2) in the first centimetre below the skin surface. Lung and heart dose constraints were never exceeded. Only 4 patients, out of 34, showed a grade 1 (G1) erythema and no instance of grade 2 (G2) skin toxicity was documented.



Conclusion

Our findings confirmed the safety of the FAST regimen also in BC patients with fair skin and large breast volume. The use of FIF technique helped in mitigating the acute skin reactions, minimizing the target dose inhomogeneity and hot spots usually associated to a higher risk of acute adverse events and suboptimal final cosmetic outcomes. A longer follow-up and a larger patients’ population are required to confirm these results