Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Breast
Poster (digital)
Clinical
Mastectomy vs conservative treatment for breast ductal carcinoma in situ
Beatriz Gil Haro, Spain
PO-1184

Abstract

Mastectomy vs conservative treatment for breast ductal carcinoma in situ
Authors:

Beatriz Gil Haro1, Cristina De La Fuente Alonso1, Sofía Córdoba Largo1, María Hernández Miguel1, Esther Ramírez Medina2, Mariano Artés Caselles1, Cesáreo Corbacho Cuevas3, Marta López Valcárcel1, Raquel Benlloch Rodríguez1, Joaquín Velasco Jiménez1, Sofía Santana Jiménez1, Olga Engel1, Jesús Romero Fernández1

1Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Madrid, Spain; 2Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Gynecology, Madrid, Spain; 3Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Pathology, Madrid, Spain

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

We aimed to compare survival and local control rates between treatment with mastectomy or breast conservation surgery (BCS) plus adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Material and Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of 156 patients diagnosed with DCIS from January 2009 to December 2018. Among them, 83 were treated with mastectomy and 73 with BCS followed by radiotherapy. Clinical characteristics: Mean age 54 years (30-85); tumor grade: 1 (27 patients), 2 (48 patients), 3 (81 patients). Radiotherapy: 50Gy, 2Gy/fx (49 patients) or 42.56 Gy, 2.66 Gy/fx (24 patients); +/-10-16 Gy boost: (40 patients).

Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates were compared between the two treatment modalities.

Statistics: Kaplan-Meier, log-rank.

Results

OS rates at 5 and 10 years was 100% in both groups. LRFS rates at 5 and 10 years was 98.7% for the mastectomy group and 98.1% for the BCS plus radiotherapy group (Figure 1). Rates of DFS in the mastectomy group were 95% and 90.8% at 5 and 10 years, respectively; and 93.9% at 5 and 10 years for BCS and radiotherapy (Figure 2). There were no significant differences between groups for DFS or LRFS. In the multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences; although young age, proximal margin (<3 mm) and grade III tumors showed a trend towards significance for recurrence for the whole series.


Conclusion

Conservative treatment is a good and safe alternative to mastectomy for patients who want to preserve their breast.