Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Head and neck
Poster (digital)
Clinical
The potential value of MRI in response evaluation after primary (C-)RT for head and neck cancer
Sandy Mohamed, Egypt
PO-1120

Abstract

The potential value of MRI in response evaluation after primary (C-)RT for head and neck cancer
Authors:

Sandy Mohamed1,2, Jacob K. Lilja-Fischer3, Mette Hjørringgaard Madsen4, Jesper G. Eriksen2,5

1NCI, Cairo University, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Cairo, Egypt; 2Aarhus University Hospital, Dept. of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark; 3Aarhus University Hospital, Dept. of Head and Neck surgery, Aarhus, Denmark; 4Aarhus University Hospital, Dept. of Neuro radiology, Aarhus, Denmark; 5Aarhus University Hospital, Dept. of Experimental clinical oncology, Aarhus, Denmark

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

To evaluate the value of routine MRI at 3 months after primary (chemo-)radiotherapy ((C-)RT), as an addition to 2 months' standard clinical evaluation for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the larynx, pharynx, and oral cavity.

Material and Methods

Consecutive patients treated with primary (C-)RT for SCC of the larynx (not T1 glottic cancer), pharynx, and oral cavity from 2016 to 2019 were analyzed. In total of 395 patients.

Clinical evaluation at 2 months after (C-)RT (which included clinical examination and flexible laryngoscopy), imaging reports, MDT decisions, and pathology reports were collected from patients records and the DAHANCA database. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate patients and imaging data.

Results

Sixteen percent of the patients had laryngeal cancer, 77% had pharyngeal cancer, of which 51% were p16 positive oropharynx carcinoma. Seven percent of the cohort had oral cavity cancer.

 

Clinical evaluation at 2 months after (C-)RT revealed that 74% of patients were clinically in complete remission. Of those, 5% of patients had persistent disease suspected by MRI at 3 months and proved by pathology.

 

Twenty-two percent of patients were clinically suspicious for residual tumor at 2 months' clinical evaluation after (C-)RT. MRI found that 57% of these had suspicious/uncertain changes, and 46% of MRI suspicious changes lead to a positive biopsy. Of patients clinically suspicious for residual tumor, 22% had pathologically confirmed disease.

 

Four percent of the cohort did not undergo clinical evaluation nor MRI (e.g. died or discontinued (C-)RT).

 

In total there were 5%, 3%, and 0.4% of the total cohort with treatment failure at the nodal site (N), primary tumor (T), or both T and N, respectively, proved by pathology after a suspicious MRI evaluation. The 1 year follow up of those patients revealed that, for N failures 64% were disease free at 1 year after salvage treatment. While 9 %, 18%, and 9% of patients with N site failure died from the disease, died from other causes/other cancer or had a recurrence within 1 year of residual tumor diagnosis respectively.  Eighty-nine percent of patients with failure at T site died from the disease within 1 year of diagnosis of the treatment failure.

Conclusion
Follow up with MRI after (C-)RT identified 5% of the patients with treatment failures after (C-)RT despite free clinical examination including endoscopy. Almost all early failures not suspected clinically were N failures. N failures had a better 1-year outcome than other treatment failures denoting that salvage treatment was more successful in patients with N-site failure. MRI is an effective modality to evaluate treatment response after primary curative RT of SCC of the larynx, pharynx and oral cavity.