Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Head and neck
Poster (digital)
Clinical
Prognostic factors analysis of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma of major salivary glands
Yu Hsuan Chang, Taiwan
PO-1074

Abstract

Prognostic factors analysis of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma of major salivary glands
Authors:

Yu Hsuan Chang1, Chin Kuo2, Jin-Ching Lin1

1Changhua christian hospital, Department of radiation oncology, Changhua, Taiwan; 2National cheng kung university hospital, Department of oncology, Tainan, Taiwan

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CXPA) is an uncommon malignant tumor with aggressive behavior but the treatment outcome and prognostic factors are rarely reported. 

Material and Methods

From April 2008 to January 2021, 22 patients with pathologically proven CXPA were collected. The treatment modality contained surgery alone (2), surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy (13) or chemoradiotherapy (5), and definitive chemoradiotherapy (2). We analyze the associations between clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes.

Results

After a median follow-up of 46.5 months (range 13-114), we observed 8 relapses (distant metastasis predominantly) and 5 deaths (all due to uncontrolled tumor). The 5-year overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), locoregional-free survival (LRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 71.7%, 64.2%, 76.3% and 64.6%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis revealed only tumor origin was a significant factor for OS. The 5-year rates of OS for the tumor arising from parotid gland and submandibular gland were 88.9% and 26.7%, respectively (P=0.011). Univariate analysis identified some potential biomarkers in predicting worse survivals- OS, submandibular vs. parotid origin (P=0.029); RFS, clinical regional lymph nodes positive vs. negative (P=0.061); LRFS, age>50 vs. ≦50 (P=0.083) and clinical regional lymph nodes positive vs. negative (P=0.069); DMFS, submandibular vs. parotid origin (P=0.095). When we focused on 20 patients who received surgery, invasiveness (invasive subgroup vs. minimal invasive/non-invasive subgroups) and pathological T-stage (T4 vs. T1-3) were two important prognostic factors on survivals.

Conclusion
Patients with tumor arising from parotid glands (versus submandibular glands) had significant better OS. Patients with clinical regional lymph node metastasis or older age had relatively worse survivals. Invasiveness and pathological T-stage affect various survivals for patients who received surgery-based treatment.