Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Saturday
May 07
14:15 - 15:15
Poster Station 1
05: Intra-fraction & real-time adaptation
Jan-Jakob Sonke, The Netherlands
1440
Poster Discussion
Physics
reconstructing the dosimetric impact of intra-fractional prostate motion in MR-guided radiotherapy
Yuqing Xiong, Germany
PD-0227

Abstract

reconstructing the dosimetric impact of intra-fractional prostate motion in MR-guided radiotherapy
Authors:

Yuqing Xiong1, Moritz Rabe2, Lukas Nierer2, Stefanie Corradini2, Claus Belka2,3, Marco Riboldi4, Guillaume Landry2, Christopher Kurz2

1Univerisity Hospital LMU, Department of Radiation Oncology, Munich, Germany; 2University Hospital LMU, Department of Radiation Oncology, Munich, Germany; 3German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany; 4LMU Munich, Department of Medical Physics, Munich, Germany

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

This study aimed at evaluating the intra-fractional prostate motion captured during MR-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer and analyzing its impact on the delivered dose over all treatment fractions. 

Material and Methods

Sagittal 2D cine MRI videos were acquired at 4 Hz during each fraction of MR-guided online adaptive radiotherapy for 10 prostate cancer patients at a 0.35 T MR-linac (ViewRay-MRIdian). The CTV (prostate) was chosen as the tracking contour and the gating window was defined as the CTV with an isotropic expansion in the [3, 5] mm range. During treatment, the target was continuously tracked by the vendor’s optical flow algorithm. Using the videos and in-house software, the centroid coordinates of the target were calculated relative to the static gating window in anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior (SI) direction. Using the static dose cloud approximation, the planned fraction dose was shifted according to the extracted motion during the beam delivery (in the gating window) to reconstruct the delivered dose by superimposing and averaging the shifted doses. For the CTV, the rectum and the bladder, DVH parameters derived from the planned and the reconstructed delivered dose distributions were compared on a fraction per fraction basis. 

Results

Prostate motion was evaluated for 174 fractions totaling 15.7 hours of cine MRI videos. Averaged over all patients, the average (± 1s) target motion was (-0.6 ± 1.0) mm in the AP and (0.0 ± 0.6) mm in the SI direction. On average, 95% of the motions were within [-3.5 mm, 2.7 mm] in AP and [-2.9 mm, 3.2 mm] in SI direction.

In few single fractions, with pronounced intra-fractional motion, substantial deviations of reconstructed and planned fraction dose were observed (Fig. 1). CTV D98% decreased by up to 7%, rectum and bladder D2% increased by up to 25% and 3%. However, averaged over all treatment fractions, CTV D98%  showed a decrease within 2% in all patients. The rectum and the bladder  increase was on average below 3% and 0.5%, respectively (Fig. 2). 



Conclusion

A workflow for extraction of the prostate motion during MR-guided radiotherapy based on 2D cine-MRI has been implemented. The obtained motion data can support the estimation of treatment efficiency in different margin/gating window scenarios and enable reconstruction of the delivered dose using a dose cloud approximation in future studies. On average, only minor deviations in target and organs-at-risk dose parameters were observed, indicating safety of the currently adopted MR-guided treatment workflow.