Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Sunday
May 08
16:55 - 17:55
Room D5
Application of functional & quantitative imaging
Adam Szmul, United Kingdom;
Faisal Mahmood, Denmark
Proffered Papers
Physics
17:25 - 17:35
Is pre-radiotherapy metabolic heterogeneity of Glioblastoma predictive of progression free survival?
Fatima TENSAOUTI, France
OC-0626

Abstract

Is pre-radiotherapy metabolic heterogeneity of Glioblastoma predictive of progression free survival?
Authors:

Fatima TENSAOUTI1,2, Franck Desmoulin2, Julia Gilhodes3, Soleakhena Ken4, Jean-Albert Lotterie5, Georges Noël6, Gilles Truc7, Marie-Pierre Sunyach8, Marie Charissoux Charissoux9, Nicolas Magné10, Vincent Lubrano2, Patrice Péran2, Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal11,12, Anne Laprie13,2

1Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse – Oncopôle , Radiation oncology, Toulouse, France; 2ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Research, Toulouse, France; 3Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse – Oncopôle , Biostatistics, Toulouse, France; 4Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse – Oncopôle , Engineering and Medical Physics, Toulouse, France; 5CHU Toulouse, Nuclear Medicine, Toulouse, France; 6Institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Radiation Oncology, Strasbourg, France; 7Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Radiation Oncology , Dijon, France; 8Centre Léon-Bérard , Radiation oncology, Lyon, France; 9Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Radiation Oncology, Montpellier, France; 10Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire Lucien Neuwirth, Radiation Oncology, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France; 11Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse – Oncopôle, Radiation oncology, Toulouse, France; 12Inserm U1037- Centre de Recherches contre le Cancer de Toulouse, Research, Toulouse, France; 13Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse – Oncopôle , Radiation oncology, Toulouse, France

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Worse outcome of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) can be attributed to the heterogeneity of the tumor. Recent research has revealed that all GBM subtypes share the hallmark feature of aggressive invasion into the surrounding tissue that are not considered in the target volume. Then, identification of the different components of the tumor is of great importance to ensure an effective treatment. 1H MRI spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) is a non-invasive technique to obtain metabolic information. It is used for diagnosis, monitoring of response to treatment, dose escalation and for detection of mutated IDH gene status in gliomas. Every tissue can be classified based on its metabolic state. MRSI is able to identify the pathologic tissue with high accuracy where Choline (Cho), Creatine (Cr), N-acetylaspartate (NAA) and lactates (Lac) are the main altered metabolites.

The aim of this work is to 1) identify clusters of metabolic heterogeneity in GBM using large MRSI data and 2) investigate which clusters can predict the progression free survival (PFS).

Material and Methods

MRSI data from 173 patients included in the prospective SPECTRO-GLIO Trial (Laprie et al, 2019 and 2021) were analysed. A total of 42 699 good quality spectra were acquired in pre-radiotherapy examination. Automatic post-processing of data was carried out with syngo.MR Spectro (VB40A; Siemens). Eight features were extracted: Cho/NAA, NAA/Cr, Cho/Cr, Lac/NAA and (%Cho, %NAA, %Cr, %Lac (ratio of each metabolite to the sum of all)).

The clustering was obtained via a mini-batch k-means algorithm, subsets of the input data are randomly sampled in each training iteration. Each mini-batch contains 1000 random spectra. The silhouette analysis was used to define the optimal number of clusters. The package used for these analyses were SuperML, factoextra and ClusterR. Cox model and Logrank test were used for PFS analysis. All analyses were conducted with R (4.0.2) and Stata software (16).

Results

Five of clusters were identified as sharing similarities of metabolic information and are predictive of PFS. Clusters 2 and 4 revealed metabolic abnormalities (increase in Cho, stability or decrease in Cr, decrease in NAA and increase in Lac). The PFS was lower when cluster 4 or 2 are the dominant clusters in patient’s MRSI data. Table 1 shows that PFS were significantly different between clusters. Patients having foremost clusters 2 or 4 in their MRSI data have lower PFS.


Conclusion

The preliminary results showed that MRSI can be used to reveal heterogeneity of the GBM in pre-radiotherapy examination. Groups of spectra sharing similarities in metabolite information would reflect the different components of tissue in the MRSI acquired volume. Clusters with metabolic abnormalities representative of tumor proliferation and hypoxia, have been identified as predictor of progression free survival. Comparison of our clustering results with neuroradiologist segmentation of different tumor compartments on multimodal MRI data is ongoing.