Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Sunday
May 08
09:00 - 10:00
Mini-Oral Theatre 2
10: Lung
Dirk De Ruysscher, The Netherlands;
Hela Hammami, Tunisia
Mini-Oral
Clinical
CPAP ventilator- assisted lung SBRT: is DIBH clinically better than free breathing?
Sarit Appel, Israel
MO-0393

Abstract

CPAP ventilator- assisted lung SBRT: is DIBH clinically better than free breathing?
Authors:

sarit appel1, Jeffrey Goldstein2, Ory Haisraely1, Yaacov Richard Lawrence1, Zvi Symon3, Sergei Dubinski4

1Sheba Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Ramat Gan, Israel; 2Soraski Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Tel Aviv, Israel; 3SHeba Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Ramat Gan, Israel; 4Sheba Medical Center, Radiation Oncology- physics, Ramat Gan, Israel

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilator to high pressure (15 cm H2O) hyperinflates the lungs and reduces diaphragmatic motion and has been used for motion management at our department. We hypothesized that combining high pressure CPAP with deep inspiratory breath hold (CPAP-DIBH) during lung stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) would improve local control, reduce toxicity, and reduce post treatment consolidation compared to high pressure CPAP in free breathing (CPAP-FB).

Material and Methods


Patients with either stage-I lung cancer or oligometastatic lung metastasis treated with CPAP-assisted SBRT between 6/2014-5/2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor characteristics, treatment variables, local control (LC), respiratory toxicity (measured at 3 months and graded by CTCAEv.5) and radiographic changes 6 and 12-months post SBRT were analyzed.

Results


Eighty patients with 114 lesions were included, of these, 59 (52%) were treated with CPAP-FB and 55 (48%) were treated with CPAP-DIBH. Median radiation dose was 51.8 Gy, median biological effective dose (BED10) was 111Gy. The groups were balanced with respect to age, gross tumor volume (GTV), radiation dose, tumor location and prior lung radiation. Lung volume in CPAP-DIBH group was 5273ml (SD1178), significantly larger than CPAP-FB:3932ml (SD1082) (p=0.001) CPAP-DIBH had smaller planning target volume (PTV) 21 cm3 (SD30) vs. 33 cm3 (SD33) in CPAP-FB (p=0.02). With median FU of 21.7months, the LC at 2 years for the entire cohort was 73.5% (95% CI 62-82%); for stage-1 lung cancer 2-yrs LC was 88% (95% CI 59-97%) and for metastatic cancer 70% (95% CI 57-80%). On univariate analysis, LC was improved with GTV≤3cm3 (HR 4.6, p=0.001), use of CPAP-DIBH (HR 2.5, p=0.04) and non-colon cancers (HR 2.8 p=0.014)(Figure 1A-D). Local control was not affected by location at lower lobes (HR 0.8, p=0.5) and BED (10) <105 Gray (HR 0.54, p=0.24). These associations remained significant for LC using CPAP-DIBH (p<0.0001), GTV≤3cm3 (p=0.001) and non-colon cancer (p=0.0001) on multivariate analysis.

Tolerability was favorable: all patients who started also completed treatment, except for one patient who suffered syncope (m/p unrelated).

Respiratory toxicity grade 2-3 occurred in 20/110 cases, and was reduced with CPAP-DIBH 6/51 (12%) vs. CPAP-FB 14/59 (24%) (OR 0.43, p=0.1). Respiratory toxicity correlated with larger PTV>35cm3 (OR 3.3, p=0.025) and PTV/GTV ration>7 (OR 3.1,P=0.036) (table 1).

At 6- and 12-months mass-like pattern consolidation was recorded in 18.3% and 24%; modified conventional pattern consolidation in 30.3% and 31%. Late consolidations correlated with larger PTV>35cm3 (OR 4.6, p=0.026), lower lobe location (OR 2.7, p=0.03), and trended to be reduce with CPAP-FB compared with CPAP-DIBH (OR 0.6, p=0.3).

Figures 1A-D:


Table 1

Conclusion


Compared with CPAP-FB, CPAP-DIBH assisted SBRT was associated with increased lung volume, decreased PTV size, improved LC and trended towards reduced toxicity, yet late consolidation was increased.