Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Monday
May 09
09:00 - 10:00
Mini-Oral Theatre 1
22: Mixed sites, palliation
Jon Cacicedo, Spain;
Nadia Bouzid, Tunisia
Mini-Oral
Clinical
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Long Bone Metastases: An International Multicenter Analysis
Indira Madani, Switzerland
MO-0713

Abstract

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Long Bone Metastases: An International Multicenter Analysis
Authors:

Indira Madani1, Matthias Guckenberger1, Darby Erler2, Bradley J. Stish3, Kenneth R. Olivier3, Sean S. Park3, W.S.C. Eppinga4, Enrica Seravalli4, Kristin J. Redmond5, Yilin Cao6, Shankar Siva7, David Chang8, Timothy K. Nguyen9, Melissa O’Neil9, Arjun Sahgal2

1University Hospital of Zurich, Radiation Oncology, Zurich, Switzerland; 2Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada; 3Mayo Clinic, Radiation Oncology, Rochester, USA; 4University Medical Center Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands; 5 John Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Baltimore, USA; 6Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Baltimore, USA; 7Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Melbourne, Australia; 8Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging , Melbourne, Australia; 9London Health Sciences Centre, Radiation Oncology, London, Canada

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Data on SBRT for long bone metastases are scarce and limited to a few cases series. The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study is to report efficacy and safety of SBRT for long bone metastases, with fracture after SBRT being the primary endpoint.    

Material and Methods

An international multicenter retrospective cohort of 120 patients with 123 long bone metastases from seven centers in Australia, Canada, Netherlands, Switzerland and the USA has been established for this analysis. All patients were treated with SBRT techniques in ≤10 fractions of total radiation doses higher than conventional radiation doses of 8 Gy/1, 20 Gy/5 or 30 Gy/10. 

Results

The median follow-up was 22 months (range 6-91 months). The majority of patients (68%) were male, with a median age of 64 (range 34-90 years). All but one patient had a Karnofsky performance status of ≥70. There were 86 femur (68.1%), 26 humerus (21.3%), 9 clavicle (7.3%) and 4 tibia (3.3%) metastases from prostate (49 [40%]), breast (23 [19%]), lung (17 [14%]), kidney (12 [10%]) and other (22 [17%]) malignancies. Twenty-nine percent of metastases were lytic. Eleven impending fractures were diagnosed before SBRT, of which 4 were surgically stabilized and 1 irradiated prior to SBRT. Oligometastases alone or in combination with pain or preserving function/skeletal integrity were the indication for treatment in 89 (74%) patients. The most common SBRT dose prescriptions were 30-50 Gy/5 (50%) and 18-24 Gy/1 (30%). Local metastasis control was 96.9%, 92.3% and 83.7% at 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively. With a median time to fracture of 10 months (range 1-28 months), 9 pathological fractures (7.3%) were diagnosed. Of the 9 pathological fractures, 3 developed at a site of impending fracture. Seven pathological fractures were in lytic metastases. During follow-up, 8 stabilization surgeries (6.5%) and 2 additional SBRT treatments (1.6%) were performed. Cumulative incidence of pathological fracture was 4.3%, 5.6% and 9.9% at 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively (Fig.1). On multivariate analysis, none of studied variables (gender, primary tumor site, metastasis location, metastasis type, and impending fracture status) was significantly associated with pathological fracture.




Conclusion

SBRT appears to be an effective treatment for long bone metastases with an acceptable risk of pathological fracture, which does not appear to be increased in historical comparison with conventional low-dose radiotherapy.