Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Saturday
May 07
09:00 - 10:00
Mini-Oral Theatre 2
02: Health economics & healthcare systems
Ajay Aggarwal, United Kingdom;
Theresa O'Donovan, Ireland
Mini-Oral
Interdisciplinary
Centralized proton therapy for medulloblastoma; an evaluation of the care infrastructure.
Hiska van der Weide, The Netherlands
MO-0061

Abstract

Centralized proton therapy for medulloblastoma; an evaluation of the care infrastructure.
Authors:

Jan F. Nauta1, John Maduro1, Agata Bannink-Gawryszuk1, Ingeborg Bosma2, Jacoline Bromberg3, Roelien Enting2, Annemarie Fock2, Mart Heesters1, Bianca Hoeben4, Louise Hooimeijer5, Eelco Hoving6, Geert Janssens4, Hanne-Rinck Jeltema7, Witold Matysiak1, Bouwe Molenbuur8, Janine Nuver9, Sabine Plasschaert6, Wim Tissing5, Nathalie van der Salm5, Caroline van Rij10, Filip de Vos11, Annemiek Walenkamp9, Hans Langendijk1, Hiske van der Weide1

1University Medical Center Groningen, Radiation Oncology, Groningen, The Netherlands; 2University Medical Center Groningen, Neurology, Groningen, The Netherlands; 3Erasmus Medical Center, Neurology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 4University Medical Center Utrecht, Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands; 5University Medical Center Groningen, Pediatric Oncology, Groningen, The Netherlands; 6Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, n/a, Utrecht, The Netherlands; 7University Medical Center Groningen, Neurosurgery, Groningen, The Netherlands; 8University Medical Center Groningen, Anesthesiology, Groningen, The Netherlands; 9University Medical Center Groningen, Medical Oncology, Groningen, The Netherlands; 10Erasmus Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 11University Medical Center Utrecht, Medical Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

The introduction of proton radiotherapy in the Netherlands resulted in the centralization of proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) for patients with medulloblastoma (MB) to a single center. For optimal outcome of MB patients, timely start of pCSI and treatment without interruptions is important. However, the technical complexity of pCSI and national-scale referrals pose a risk for treatment delays. Therefore, to aid in high quality care, integration of pCSI within the national pediatric oncology center and collaboration within the Dutch neuro oncology society – rare cancer working group was established. In this study, we evaluated the care infrastructure for pCSI for a nationwide defined MB patient cohort.

Material and Methods

All pediatric and adult MB patients referred for pCSI to our center between February 2018 and July 2021 were included in this analysis. International referrals were excluded. The interval between surgery and start of pCSI was calculated, excluding patients who received pre-pCSI (neo-adjuvant) chemotherapy. Conform the SIOP PNET5 protocol, a maximum of 40 days was used as the benchmark. Overall treatment time and number of photon fractions were evaluated. Data regarding multidisciplinary care during pCSI including: need for anesthesia, involvement of (para)medical disciplines and hospitalization details were extracted from the medical records.

Results

Between February 2018 and July 2021, 55 MB patients, including 38 (69%) pediatric (<18 years) patients were treated with pCSI at our center. The clinical characteristics and treatment details are listed in Table 1. The time interval between surgery and start of pCSI for pediatric and adult patients was median of 32 days (IQR 30, 35) and 44 days (IQR 36, 61) respectively. The benchmark of 40 days was reached in 91.7% of pediatric patients and 42% of adult patients. Reason for a longer interval was the medical condition for 2/3 pediatric patients and 4/7 adults. The median overall treatment time for pediatric and adult patients combined was 42 days. There was only 1 patient with a treatment interruption >3 days. Five patients received a median of 4 photon fractions (IQR 1, 9) as part of their treatment; for 4 patients this was due to medical reasons, for 1 patient 1 fraction due to downtime of the proton facility. The delivered multidisciplinary care during pCSI treatment is listed in Table 2. Anesthesia was performed predominantly for patients aged 8 years and younger.

Conclusion

The pCSI infrastructure for pediatric MB patients, integrated within the national pediatric oncology center, facilitated a timely start of treatment in over 90% of patients. For adult patients, post-surgical condition is a common reason for delayed start of treatment. During pCSI treatment, a well-orchestrated interplay between several (para)medical disciplines is required to provide all potential necessary care. We were able to deliver pCSI treatment with less than 3 days interruption to in 98% of patients.