Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Saturday
May 07
16:55 - 17:55
Room D3
Lower GI
Jean-Emmanuel Bibault, France;
Vincenzo Valentini, Italy
Proffered Papers
Clinical
16:45 - 16:55
Comprising a consensus-based delineation guideline for locally recurrent rectal cancer
Floor Piqeur, The Netherlands
OC-0267

Abstract

Comprising a consensus-based delineation guideline for locally recurrent rectal cancer
Authors:

Floor Piqeur1, B.J.P. Hupkens2, P. Meijnen3, H.M. Ceha4, M. Berbee5, M. Dieters6, J.W.A. Burger7, H.J.T. Rutten7, J. Nederend8, C.A.M. Marijnen9,10, H.M.U. Peulen2, M.G. Witte11

1Catharina Hospital , Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; 2Catharina Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; 3Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 4Haaglanden Medical Centre, Radiation Oncology, Leidschendam, The Netherlands; 5Maastro Clinic, Radiation Oncology, Maastricht, The Netherlands; 6University Medical Centre Groningen, Radiation Oncology, Groningen, The Netherlands; 7Catharina Hospital, Surgery, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; 8Catharina Hospital, Radiology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; 9Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 10Leiden University Medical Centre, Radiation Oncology, Leiden, The Netherlands; 11The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) requires multidisciplinary management. The PelvEx-II trial evaluates the benefit of induction chemotherapy (IC) preceding chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for LRRC. CRT is used to downstage the tumour volume and facilitate a radical resection. However, delineation in LRRC is hampered by factors such as previous surgery, multifocality and presence of fibrosis. Additionally, radiation oncologists (ROs) often have limited experience with LRRC and evidence-based resources to aid in delineation are lacking. Therefore, target volumes may vary, potentially causing tumour miss or unnecessary re-irradiation of OAR. Through 2 workshops we developed a delineation guideline to optimize consistency within the trial.

Material and Methods

7 ROs from 7 Dutch centres treating > 10 yearly cases of LRRC participated in 2 meetings. ROs delineated 3 cases per meeting. During meeting 1, 3 surgeons and a radiologist identified regions at risk for re-recurrence or involved resection margins, leading to guidelines for RT naive patients and patients undergoing re-irradiation. These were validated and adjusted during meeting 2. Case 1.2 was repeated in case 2.1 to test guideline adherence. A median delineation was calculated per case. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was calculated for each GTV and CTV, in reference to the median delineation.

Results

The following consensus guideline was developed, specifically targeting identified at-risk regions.

GTV should encompass all macroscopic visible tumour, including involved areas of any organ. If no distinction can be made between fibrosis and GTV, the fibrotic area should be included in the GTV. Otherwise, the fibrotic area can be included in the CTV. After IC, GTV may be adjusted for regression (towards other structures). CTV includes GTV with a 1 cm margin and all pre-treatment GTV. CTV should not be adjusted towards other organs, except towards the pelvic bones if bony invasion is clearly absent. Multifocal recurrences should be encompassed in one CTV, with the upper and lower limit 1 cm beyond the most cranial and caudal GTV respectively.

For RT naïve patients, elective CTV is advised, conform treatment of LARC, i.e. lymph nodes, remaining mesorectal fat and, depending on recurrence location, the anal sphincter. For previously irradiated patients, no elective fields should be irradiated.

Average DSC of GTV and CTV increased from 0.60 to 0.66 and 0.71 to 0.81 between case 1.2 and 2.1 respectively.


Institution

Case

1
2
3
4
5
Mean
1.1
0.84
0.86
0.72
0.28
0.75
0.69
1.2
0.82
0.85
0.80
0.27
0.82
0.71
1.3
0.83
0.94

0.64
0.86
0.81
2.1
0.82
0.87
0.80
0.81
0.73
0.81
2.2
0.66
0.75
0.76
0.71

0.72
2.3
0.85
0.35
0.89
0.89

0.74

Table 1: DSC of CTV in reference to median delineation.


Conclusion

Currently, there is limited evidence for delineation guidelines in LRRC. This study provides a first multidisciplinary, consensus-based guideline. Verification in re-recurrences is needed to understand disease behaviour and recurrence patterns and to optimize delineation guidelines accordingly.