Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Saturday
May 07
10:30 - 11:30
Room D3
Late-breaking
Anna Kirby, United Kingdom;
Ben Slotman, The Netherlands
Proffered Papers
Clinical
10:30 - 10:40
IMRT vs IMRT and brachytherapy for early oropharyngeal cancers (Brachytrial) : A randomized trial
OC-0100

Abstract

IMRT vs IMRT and brachytherapy for early oropharyngeal cancers (Brachytrial) : A randomized trial
Authors:

Ashwini Budrukkar1, Vedang Murthy2, Sheetal Kashid3, Monali Swain3, Venkatesh Rangarajan4, Sarbani Ghosh Laskar3, Sadhana Kannan5, Shrikant Kale6, Rituraj Upereti6, Shaleeni Gawli3, Prathamesh Pai7, Gouri Pantvaidya7, Tejpal Gupta2, Jai Prakash Agarwal3

1Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, , Department of Radiation Oncology, Mumbai, India; 2Tata Memorial Hospital and Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Department of Radiation Oncology, Mumbai, India; 3Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mumbai, India; 4Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Mumbai, India; 5Tata Memorial Hospital and Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Clinical Research Secretariat, Mumbai, India; 6Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Department of Medical Physics, Mumbai, India; 7Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Department of Head Neck Surgery, Mumbai, India

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

To compare clinical outcomes of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) alone vs IMRT+ brachytherapy in patients with early staged oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers (OSCC).

Material and Methods

Newly diagnosed patients with  biopsy proven stage I and II OSCC of were randomized to IMRT alone vs IMRT + brachytherapy. Randomization was done using computer generated block randomization (1:1) at a single centre. All patients received IMRT to a dose of 50Gy/25#/5 weeks in phase I. In phase II patients in the IMRT arm received 20Gy/10#/2 weeks and in the brachytherapy arm received high dose rate brachytherapy to a dose 21Gy/7fractions/2 fractions per day. Primary endpoint of the trial was reduction in xerostomia at 6 months. Evaluation of xerostomia was done using T99 salivary scintigraphy, RTOG toxicity criteria, EORTC quality of life questionnaire and xerostomia questionnaire (XQ) at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Reduction in salivary function using scintigraphy was quantified by salivary excretion fraction (SEF) ratio. Post treatment SEF ratio <45% was considered as severe salivary toxicity. Secondary endpoints were local control (LC), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OAS).

Results

Between November 2009 to January 2020, 90 patients were randomized to IMRT (N=46) or IMRT plus brachytherapy (N=44).  Seven patients in the brachytherapy arm could not receive brachytherapy (technical feasibility-5, unfit for anesthesia -2) and were treated with IMRT. The analysis was done both by  intention to treat and per protocol.
At 6 months, SEF <45%  for ipsilateral parotid was observed in 15.2% patients in brachytherapy arm while it was seen in 43.8% patients in IMRT arm (p<0.01)  with similar trend at 12 and 24 months (p<0.01) (Fig 1).  For contralateral parotid at 6 months SEF <45% was observed in 12% in brachytherapy arm while it was 25% in IMRT arm (p=0.18) with similar trend at 12, 24 months (p=0.13). At 6 months RTOG Grade ≥ 2 xerostomia  was  4% in brachytherapy arm while it was 12.5% in IMRT arm (p=0.33). RTOG Grade ≥ 2 xerostomia  over the time period was 11. 4% in brachytherapy arm while it was 28.3% in IMRT arm (p=0.04). The mean xerostomia score of XQ at 6 months was 28 for brachytherapy and 37 for IMRT with similar trend at 12 and 24 months (p=0.02).
At a median follow up of 42.5 months the 2 year LC was 69% in brachytherapy arm and 61.4% in IMRT arm (p=0.23). There was a trend towards improved LC with brachytherapy in per protocol analysis (74.4% vs 58.7% p=0.07). The 2 year OAS was 70.3% in brachytherapy arm and 72.6% in IMRT arm (p=0.39)

Figure 1. Xerostomia by Salivary scintigraphy for ipsilateral parotid




Conclusion

Addition of brachytherapy to IMRT for early stage oropharyngeal cancers results in significant reduction in xerostomia and should be considered as the standard of care in suitable cases.