Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Monday
May 15
16:30 - 17:30
Business Suite 1-2
Lung 2
Cécile Le Péchoux, France
3506
Poster Discussion
Clinical
Phase II trial of single-fraction SABR on 0.35T MRI-linac for thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic tumors
Rupesh Kotecha, USA
PD-0965

Abstract

Phase II trial of single-fraction SABR on 0.35T MRI-linac for thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic tumors
Authors:

Michael Chuong1, Kathryn Mittauer1, Martin Tom2, Noah Kalman1, James McCulloch1, Diane Alvarez1, Carolina Rojas1, Paul Kaywin3, Antonio Ucar3, Federico Albrecht3, Fernando De Zarraga3, Santiago Aparo3, Guilherme Rabinowits3, Muni Rubens4, Alonso Gutierrez1, Rupesh Kotecha1

1Miami Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, Miami, USA; 2University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA; 3Miami Cancer Institute, Medical Oncology, Miami, USA; 4Miami Cancer Institute, Clinical Research Office, Miami, USA

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Single-fraction (1-fxn) SABR is rarely utilized, potentially due to the absence of real-time imaging on CT-guided linacs, limited CBCT soft tissue resolution, and concerns of geographic miss. MRI-linacs (MRLs) provide real-time imaging, visual confirmation of geographic accuracy, and on-table adaptive radiation therapy (ART) that may facilitate broader adoption of 1-fxn SABR. However, the feasibility of delivering 1-fxn SABR on an MRL within a reasonable amount of time has not been previously evaluated.    

Material and Methods

We developed a prospective feasibility and tolerability trial (NCT04939246) of 1-fxn SABR delivered on a 0.35T MRL for primary/metastatic lesions of the lung (30-34 Gy; BED10 = 120-149.6 Gy), liver (35-40 Gy; BED10 = 157.5-200 Gy), pancreas (25 Gy; BED10 = 87.5 Gy), adrenal gland (25 Gy), kidney (25 Gy), and abdominal/pelvic lymph nodes (LNs) (25 Gy). Each fxn was delivered in breath-hold (BH); oxygen (O2) by nasal cannula to facilitate BH was recommended. Continuous intrafraction soft tissue tracking and automatic beam gating were required. Primary objectives include: 1) completing treatment in 90 minutes of entering the treatment room (total in-room time) and 2) acute grade 3+ toxicity <15%. Secondary objectives include 1-year LC, 1-year OS, QOL, and late grade 3+ toxicity. The study opened in June 2021 with an accrual goal of 30 patients. We conducted an unplanned interim analysis of the primary objectives to inform whether to open this trial at a second institution.

Results

20 patients have been treated with 21 fxns to 22 lesions in the lung (n=9; 40.9%), liver (n=5; 22.7%), adrenal gland (n=4; 18.2%), abdominal LNs (n=3; 13.6%), and pancreas (n=1; 4.5%). 2 patients (10%) had multiple lesions, 1 with 2 lung metastases sequentially treated with separate plans and another having 2 LN metastases concurrently treated with a single plan. Median GTV and PTV volumes were 4.45 cc (range, 1.02-40.46) and 15.85 cc (range, 5.29-95.81), respectively. 5 patients (25%), all with abdominal targets, needed ART to meet OAR constraints. 18 (90%) received O2. Median total in-room and treatment delivery times were 56 minutes (range, 40-195) and 33 minutes (range, 22-144), respectively. Total in-room time was 90 minutes for 19 fxns (90.5%). >90 minutes elapsed for 2 patients, 1 with nausea who needed a break and another who had difficulty reproducing the treatment position; both completed SABR on the same day. Median follow-up is 5.4 months (range, 0-15.3). 1 patient (5%) experienced acute grade 3 toxicity (chest pain) possibly related to lung SABR that resolved spontaneously within 1 day.

Conclusion

We demonstrate encouraging early outcomes of 1-fxn SABR delivered in BH on a 0.35T MRL. Should feasibility and tolerability be confirmed upon trial completion, additional studies would be warranted to evaluate this novel treatment strategy especially among patients with 2+ metastatic lesions for which multi-fxn SABR might otherwise be delivered over several weeks.