Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Gynaecological
6014
Poster (Digital)
Clinical
A phase I/II study of SBRT boost in patients with cervical cancer who are ineligible for ICBT
Kei Ito, Japan
PO-1431

Abstract

A phase I/II study of SBRT boost in patients with cervical cancer who are ineligible for ICBT
Authors:

Kei Ito1, Yujiro Nakajima1, Hiroaki Ogawa1, Akiko Furusawa2, Keiko Murofushi1, Satoshi Kito1, Nao Kino2, Toshiharu Yasugi2, Takashi Uno3, Katsuyuki Karasawa1

1Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Tokyo, Japan; 2Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Gynecology, Tokyo, Japan; 3Chiba University, Radiology, Chiba, Japan

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Whole-pelvic radiotherapy in combination with intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. However, some patients are ineligible. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost is a promising treatment for patients with cervical cancer who are ineligible for ICBT. The aim of this multicenter, single-arm, phase I/II study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of SBRT boost.

Material and Methods

ICBT-ineligible patients with untreated cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [2008] stage IB1–IIIB) were enrolled between April 2016 and October 2020. Patients underwent whole-pelvic radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions) with SBRT boost to the primary lesion. In the phase I dose-escalation cohort (3 + 3 design), patients were treated with SBRT boost of 21 or 22.5 Gy in 3 fractions in 3 days. Although dose-limiting toxicity was not confirmed, a dose of 21 Gy was selected for the phase II cohort, because of safety concerns. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival.

Results

Twenty-one patients (phase I, n = 3; phase II, n = 18) were enrolled between April 2016 and October 2020; 17 (81%) had clinical stage III–IV disease with para-aortic lymph node metastases. The median (range) follow-up was 29 (10–72) months. The initial response was complete response in 20 patients and partial response in one patient. The 2-year locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 84%, 67%, and 81%, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity was confirmed in one patient each in the acute (diarrhea) and late (urinary tract obstruction) phase.

Conclusion

SBRT boost was effective and safe, even in patients with advanced disease in whom ICBT was not possible. These findings suggest that SBRT boost is an important treatment option for patients with cervical cancer who are ineligible for ICBT.