Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Sarcoma/Skin cancer/malignant melanoma
6022
Poster (Digital)
Clinical
Radiation- induced sarcoma after radiotherapy in breast cancer: analysis of a single institution.
Maria Cerrolaza, Spain
PO-1561

Abstract

Radiation- induced sarcoma after radiotherapy in breast cancer: analysis of a single institution.
Authors:

Maria Cerrolaza1, Victoria Navarro2, Alberto Lanuza2, Claudia Colom1, Pilar Sanagustin1, Alida Pardo3, Marina Gascon3, Arantxa Campos4, Reyes Ibañez1

1University Hospital Miguel Servet, Radiation Oncology, ZARAGOZA, Spain; 2University Hospital Miguel Servet, Radiation Oncology, ZARAGOZA, Spain; 3University Clinical Hospital Lozano Blesa, Radiation Oncology, ZARAGOZA, Spain; 4University Hospital Miguel Servet,, Radiation Oncology, ZARAGOZA, Spain

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Radiotherapy is an integral component of the treatment of patients with primary breast cancer. Radiation-induced sarcoma (RIS) is a rare iatrogenic malignancy that can occur after radiotherapy and is associated with poor outcomes. The most frequent histology is angiosarcoma and the occurrence rate is 0.03%–8%.

To be classified as RIS, must be fulfilled that: there must be evidence of an initial malignant tumour of a different histology than the RIS, the second malignancy must histopathologically be a sarcoma; development of the sarcoma must occur in an irradiated field, and there must be a latency period between the two malignancies set at 3 years but cases have been described as occurring within the first 6 months after radiotherapy,

There is controversy about the area of appearance, being one of the theories its origin arises at the edge of the radiation fields where the doses are lower. The present study aimed to analyze the cases with RIS after radiotherapy in breast cancer in our institution.

Material and Methods

Data were collected from patients diagnosed with RIS who had received previous treatment with adjuvant radiotherapy after breast cancer from 2010-2021. Oncologic history, age, time of sarcoma onset since irradiation, location, treatment received and current status were analysed.

Results

5 patients were found with a mean age at RIS diagnosis of 66.2 years. As neoplastic history one of them presented 3 previous neoplasms (bilateral breast cancer and endometrium) and three patients 2 neoplasms (60%) (bilateral breast, and thyroid and breast cancer). The mean latency time between the administration of RT in the primary breast cancer and the diagnosis of sarcoma was 14 years (range 1-27) of which 80% presented histology consistent with angiosarcoma.

The diagnosis in two patients arose as cutaneous thickening with multiple cutaneous nodules, one of them as an adenopathic conglomerate and two of them as a nodule in the parasternal region. After the extension study, 2 patients presented multiple distant metastases.

Treatment in 3 patients was multimodal by surgery, chemotherapy (CT) and Radiotherapy (RT), one patient was treated with palliative CT and another with surgery alone.

After a median follow-up of 24 months, 2 patients died cancer-specific (40%) with a median of 16 months since diagnosis (range 11-21). Currently 3 patients are alive with stable disease after a median follow-up of 34 months (range 24-52).

A statistically significant association was found between stage and death (p=0.025) as well as time between RT and RIS, and death (p= 0.009). Multimodal treatment is associated statistically significant differences with longer follow- up time (p=0.041). 

Conclusion

The results from this review on 5 patients suggest that the addition of reirradiation to surgery and chemotherapy – multimodal approach - might be benefit for the local control of RIS. However, it warrants further investigation and a larger number of patients.